ND: Stiff penalties needed for animal abuse


In a recent edition of the Williston Herald, two stories on similar topics provided a stark contrast.

Williston (N.D.) Herald, The Jamestown Sun, February 8, 2013

Tyler-020805-018-685x320In a recent edition of the Williston Herald, two stories on similar topics provided a stark contrast.

In one, a local woman was sentenced to no time in jail and a fine of $200 after pleading guilty to bludgeoning her dog to death on Christmas Day.

In that case, Wanda Steen admitted she was guilty. But since state law says animal cruelty, even if the animal is killed, is only a misdemeanor, the prosecutor had no choice but to accept a small fine and a few conditions.

Steen will be on probation for a year, but since the probation is unsupervised it will be difficult for authorities to be certain if Steen avoids alcohol and pets as the court has ordered.

While Steen was in court pleading guilty and avoiding any serious penalty, the North Dakota Legislature was beginning to consider a bill that would change the way animal cruelty is treated in North Dakota.

Under the legislation — Senate Bill 2211 — animal cruelty is defined as anyone who causes an animal “unjustifiable pain, suffering or death, including the infliction of any injury that results in a substantial risk of death” or “any willful act or omission that results in a serious illness and leaves an animal significantly disfigured or causes prolonged impairment.” If the law is passed, animal cruelty could be a Class C felony.

Under the circumstances of the bill, failure to provide adequate care would be a class A misdemeanor for the first offense and a class C felony for a second or subsequent offense within five years. Penalty for animal abuse would mirror the adequate care penalties.

Three months ago, the voters of North Dakota voted down Measure 5, an effort to increase the penalties for animal abusers. At the time, opponents of the legislation said animal cruelty just wasn’t a problem in North Dakota. With two cases in our area in the last few months, it is clear that it not true.

Many who opposed Measure 5 said they preferred the law that is now in front of the Legislature. After reviewing the proposal, we agree that it would make a good law. The case here in Williston and a horse shooting case in McKenzie County prove that stiff penalties are needed, and they are needed now.

The vast majority of pet owners treats their animals with love and take all the steps necessary to keep them safe and healthy. But as long as there are a few that think abuse is OK, North Dakota must act.

AUTHOR: Jerry Finch
  • Robynne Catheron

    Frustrating, isn’t it? I recently helped shut down a local horse “rescue” that was guilty of not only starving a dozen horses and allowing several to die slowly without vet care, but also scamming people across the country out of thousands upon thousands of dollars. She got probation. I started a petition to upgrade NY animal welfare laws from a misdemeanor to a felony, and worked very hard to get a measly 500 signatures. Folks are so weary of petitions. What can a person do, other than hound the state representatives? Grrrrr.

    February 8, 2013
  • janwindsong

    I agree – penalties need to be in place.

    February 8, 2013
  • Jerry, I would like your opinion/recommendations to Robynne’s question: since people have become overwhelmed with the plethora of petitions circulating on FB or Change.org, or???, what is the best way to make people in any state that doesn’t have strict animal abuse/cruelty laws in place aware of the situation and what action is needed from them to combat it with tougher laws/penalties?

    February 8, 2013